The other day I went YouTubn’ around and found this little gem called “Atheist Atrocities: Frightening Stats About Atheists.” Throughout history, people have killed and been killed in the name of a religion and/or in the name of a god. Every single day, somewhere in the world believers of various religions kill “infidels” who believe something different than they do. Could the same be said about atheist, agnostics, and other freethinkers? When was the last time an atheist strapped a bomb to himself to kill complete strangers on a bus, in a pizzeria, a church, mosque, or synagogue? Previous to watching this video, I was unaware of any mass killing in the name of atheism. The title of the video intrigued me; I’m always willing to learn even if what I learn challenges what I believe to be true. This video mostly failed to make the case.
8 Comments:
Got a quick question for you: when you mention people killing in the name of religion (or atheism for that matter), do you mean to say that these people's religious (or atheistic) beliefs influenced or even caused the killings? Or do you just want to say that history is full of people claiming religious justification (or again, atheist justification) for the killings?
In my experience people are not inclined to do the right thing if left to their own devices- and I was wondering if you really thought that either world-view legitimatly led one to killing?
I think there's an important difference to be noted here. While atheists can be killers these folks weren't killed in the name of atheism. They were killed in the name of a social movement. The same is true in the USSR and under Chairman Mao.
The religious atrocities happened in the NAME of their religion/god and I think that's an important distinction.
Just a quick observation. While I am in complete agreement on the misinterpretation of "religious justification" argument often most by theists (I am an atheist myself), and while I loathe having to answer to theists' twisted version of the truth when they invoke them, I must take exception to the characterization of Thomas Paine's Common Sense as a "scathing rebuke of the Bible and organized religion". I seem to remember it being a scathing rebuke of Britain's dominance world dominance as opposed to a work of primarily religious dissent. Am I wrong?
Sorry about the grammar. I was on the phone. You get my point though?
Anonymous, you are correct. When I wrote this (almost a year ago), the work I should have referenced here would be "The Age of Reason." "Reason" was the scathing rebuke of organized religion, "Common Sense" was aimed at American colonists to raise up against the British to fight for independence.
I have since corrected the post.
Thanks!
Hi, nice post. I have been wondering about this topic,so thanks for sharing. I will certainly be subscribing to your blog.
zhengjx20160602
tiffany and co
michael kors outlet clearance
vans outlet
hollister clothing store
coach outlet store online
oakley sunglasses
longchamp le pliage
louis vuitton outlet stores
jordan 3 retro
louis vuitton outlet
christian louboutin outlet
louis vuitton purses
ray bans
jordan 6s
true religion jeans
celine outlet
louboutin shoes
ray ban wayfarer
air max
michael kors outlet
michael kors outlet
oakley sunglasses
kate spade handbags
gucci outlet online
louis vuitton outlet online
true religion outlet store
coach outlet canada
ray ban sunglasses
louis vuitton handbags
gucci outlet
kate spade handbags
louis vuitton handbags
louis vuitton handbags
coach factory outlet online
nike trainers sale
louis vuitton
concords 11
replica rolex watches
christian louboutin sale
kobe shoes 11
qzz0717
christian louboutin outlet
michael kors outlet
kevin durant jerseys
nike presto
pandora charms
trailblazers jerseys
heat jerseys
ugg outlet
fila shoes
coach outlet
Post a Comment
<< Home